In mathematics, this is known as “proof by circularity”, and is partly where I got the idea for this comic (from someone else).
However, my real motivation came from the fact that I was looking at the literature for a specific topic, and I kept on seeing the same few papers being referenced. I was hoping to find something new, but I couldn’t seem to break this “bubble” of citations.
24 Feb 2020
He also doesn’t believe in exhaustion, since you can’t check each case. Nor is he a fan of the continuum.
14 Feb 2020
“To prove this statement, I invoke Theorem 3.2 of our textbook in conjunction with Corollary 67.1, which together implies our result trivially.”
12 Feb 2020
The side job of a scientist is being a public advocate for science anyway. I guess we are close to politicians after all.
10 Feb 2020
I just try to be unreasonable all the time. Much easier to be consistent.
07 Feb 2020
As you might imagine, this is definitely based on a true story. I mean come on, the problem was identical to the previous, save one number.
05 Feb 2020